Skip to content

Docs: fix client ip detection docs#6104

Merged
rudrakhp merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
rudrakhp:fix_client_ip_detection_docs
May 18, 2025
Merged

Docs: fix client ip detection docs#6104
rudrakhp merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
rudrakhp:fix_client_ip_detection_docs

Conversation

@rudrakhp
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Updates commands and expected outputs in client traffic policy docs.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Need to update commands and expected outputs after migration to original IP detection extension. Related #4702

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #5558

@rudrakhp rudrakhp requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2025 13:40
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.44%. Comparing base (020d60a) to head (9402251).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6104      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.49%   70.44%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         217      217              
  Lines       36181    36181              
==========================================
- Hits        25504    25488      -16     
- Misses       9162     9175      +13     
- Partials     1515     1518       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: Rudrakh Panigrahi <rudrakh97@gmail.com>
@rudrakhp rudrakhp merged commit c1e537b into envoyproxy:main May 18, 2025
29 of 30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: Unexpected Output in Client Traffic Policy

2 participants