-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
dns: reinitialize c-ares channel on ARES_ETIMEOUT #41718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the UDP sockets timeout, wouldn't c-ares try to use a new UDP socket next time it needs to send a DNS query? If you could explain a bit more in detail about the exact flow and socket state that leads to needing to re-initialize the channel, that would be helpful, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @abeyad,
This PR builds on work from #9899 to address #4543. We're observing a situation where after DNS timeouts occur, Envoy enters a bad state and continues using stale IP addresses (despite packet capture showing correct IPs are being returned). This is only fixed after we restart Envoy.
ares_reinit()will help achieve the same effect without needing a full restart. The other error codes (ARES_ECONNREFUSED,ARES_ESERVFAIL, etc.) already trigger reinit under the same assumption that the channel state may be broken. The c-ares project has acknowledged similar channel state issues: c-ares/c-ares#301.Let me know what you think!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Najji , I'm not opposed to the option, as it seems we do similar restarting of the c-ares channel for
ARES_ECONNREFUSED, as long as it is false by default.It seems like the issue is in the connection managed by c-ares though, so I'm guessing there is a bug in c-ares that doesn't deal with timed-out connections properly. But given we don't control c-ares, I think it's fine to add this option to get around the issue.
Thanks!