-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Always use IPv6 sockets on Android #21803
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 5 commits
e2afd07
253fd88
5d32db8
834822d
6f2721f
1f1588c
eff6d25
10ff948
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ FALSE_RUNTIME_GUARD(envoy_reloadable_features_thrift_connection_draining); | |
| FALSE_RUNTIME_GUARD(envoy_reloadable_features_http2_use_oghttp2); | ||
| // Used to track if runtime is initialized. | ||
| FALSE_RUNTIME_GUARD(envoy_reloadable_features_runtime_initialized); | ||
| // TODO(mattklein123): Flip this to true and/or remove completely once verified by Envoy Mobile. | ||
| FALSE_RUNTIME_GUARD(envoy_reloadable_features_android_always_use_v6); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also please unit test, or add unit tests to the TODO here if the timing is too tight.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do you have a suggestion of how to unit test this in this repo? This is all behind an android only ifdef.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. random drive by comment (ignore me if this doesnt make sense) can you make this: and add a bazel defines to test it? if you want to resuse this you can wrap it with a
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think I would prefer to not have a build flag for it since that will be harder to test. I think Alyssa's suggestion is good to just refactor it and add a unit test. I can do that but will do it as a follow up. |
||
|
|
||
| // Block of non-boolean flags. These are deprecated. Do not add more. | ||
| ABSL_FLAG(uint64_t, envoy_headermap_lazy_map_min_size, 3, ""); // NOLINT | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.