-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
thrift router: Support request subset lb #18541
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 12 commits
9ec0944
abb822d
58df464
f68bb91
2aa1ed4
3ea7ccc
4342443
fe993ff
e4bf7a3
98f5eab
99a1ce9
43bbed8
1f4e49e
3ec0de9
dc26d39
8b0af2d
825a0f0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ | |
| #include "envoy/upstream/load_balancer.h" | ||
|
|
||
| #include "source/common/http/header_utility.h" | ||
| #include "source/common/router/metadatamatchcriteria_impl.h" | ||
| #include "source/common/upstream/load_balancer_impl.h" | ||
| #include "source/extensions/filters/network/thrift_proxy/conn_manager.h" | ||
| #include "source/extensions/filters/network/thrift_proxy/filters/filter.h" | ||
|
|
@@ -266,7 +267,25 @@ class Router : public Tcp::ConnectionPool::UpstreamCallbacks, | |
| // Upstream::LoadBalancerContext | ||
| const Network::Connection* downstreamConnection() const override; | ||
| const Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteria* metadataMatchCriteria() override { | ||
| return route_entry_ ? route_entry_->metadataMatchCriteria() : nullptr; | ||
| const Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteria* route_criteria = | ||
| (route_entry_ != nullptr) ? route_entry_->metadataMatchCriteria() : nullptr; | ||
|
|
||
| // Support getting metadata match criteria from thrift request. | ||
| const auto& request_metadata = callbacks_->streamInfo().dynamicMetadata().filter_metadata(); | ||
| const auto filter_it = request_metadata.find(Envoy::Config::MetadataFilters::get().ENVOY_LB); | ||
|
|
||
| if (filter_it == request_metadata.end()) { | ||
| return route_criteria; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (route_criteria != nullptr) { | ||
| metadata_match_criteria_ = route_criteria->mergeMatchCriteria(filter_it->second); | ||
| } else { | ||
| metadata_match_criteria_ = | ||
| std::make_unique<Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteriaImpl>(filter_it->second); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return metadata_match_criteria_.get(); | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we can simplify this a bit:
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. using ifelse is better?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. thx for review
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah looks great -- I am just a fan of the ternary operator 😁. |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Tcp::ConnectionPool::UpstreamCallbacks | ||
|
|
@@ -282,6 +301,7 @@ class Router : public Tcp::ConnectionPool::UpstreamCallbacks, | |
| std::unique_ptr<UpstreamResponseCallbacksImpl> upstream_response_callbacks_{}; | ||
| RouteConstSharedPtr route_{}; | ||
| const RouteEntry* route_entry_{}; | ||
| Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteriaConstPtr metadata_match_criteria_; | ||
|
|
||
| std::unique_ptr<UpstreamRequest> upstream_request_; | ||
| Buffer::OwnedImpl upstream_request_buffer_; | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -138,6 +138,96 @@ class ThriftRouterTestBase { | |
| metadata_->setSequenceId(sequence_id); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| void verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRequest(bool route_entry_has_match) { | ||
| ProtobufWkt::Struct request_struct; | ||
| ProtobufWkt::Value val; | ||
|
|
||
| // Populate metadata like StreamInfo.setDynamicMetadata() would. | ||
| auto& fields_map = *request_struct.mutable_fields(); | ||
| val.set_string_value("v3.1"); | ||
| fields_map["version"] = val; | ||
| val.set_string_value("devel"); | ||
| fields_map["stage"] = val; | ||
| val.set_string_value("1"); | ||
| fields_map["xkey_in_request"] = val; | ||
| (*callbacks_.stream_info_.metadata_ | ||
| .mutable_filter_metadata())[Envoy::Config::MetadataFilters::get().ENVOY_LB] = | ||
| request_struct; | ||
|
|
||
| // Populate route entry's metadata which will be overridden. | ||
| val.set_string_value("v3.0"); | ||
| fields_map = *request_struct.mutable_fields(); | ||
| fields_map["version"] = val; | ||
| fields_map.erase("xkey_in_request"); | ||
| Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteriaImpl route_entry_matches(request_struct); | ||
|
xiaoma2015 marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
|
|
||
| if (route_entry_has_match) { | ||
| ON_CALL(route_entry_, metadataMatchCriteria()).WillByDefault(Return(&route_entry_matches)); | ||
| } else { | ||
| ON_CALL(route_entry_, metadataMatchCriteria()).WillByDefault(Return(nullptr)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| auto match = router_->metadataMatchCriteria()->metadataMatchCriteria(); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ(match.size(), 3); | ||
| auto it = match.begin(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Note: metadataMatchCriteria() keeps its entries sorted, so the order for checks | ||
| // below matters. | ||
|
|
||
| // `stage` was only set by the request, not by the route entry. | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->name(), "stage"); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->value().value().string_value(), "devel"); | ||
| it++; | ||
|
|
||
| // `version` should be what came from the request and override the route entry's. | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->name(), "version"); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->value().value().string_value(), "v3.1"); | ||
| it++; | ||
|
|
||
| // `xkey_in_request` was only set by the request | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->name(), "xkey_in_request"); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->value().value().string_value(), "1"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| void verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRoute(bool route_entry_has_match) { | ||
| ProtobufWkt::Struct route_struct; | ||
| ProtobufWkt::Value val; | ||
|
|
||
| auto& fields_map = *route_struct.mutable_fields(); | ||
| val.set_string_value("v3.1"); | ||
| fields_map["version"] = val; | ||
| val.set_string_value("devel"); | ||
| fields_map["stage"] = val; | ||
|
|
||
| Envoy::Router::MetadataMatchCriteriaImpl route_entry_matches(route_struct); | ||
|
|
||
| if (route_entry_has_match) { | ||
| ON_CALL(route_entry_, metadataMatchCriteria()).WillByDefault(Return(&route_entry_matches)); | ||
|
|
||
| EXPECT_NE(nullptr, router_->metadataMatchCriteria()); | ||
| auto match = router_->metadataMatchCriteria()->metadataMatchCriteria(); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ(match.size(), 2); | ||
| auto it = match.begin(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Note: metadataMatchCriteria() keeps its entries sorted, so the order for checks | ||
| // below matters. | ||
|
|
||
| // `stage` was set by the route entry. | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->name(), "stage"); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->value().value().string_value(), "devel"); | ||
| it++; | ||
|
|
||
| // `version` was set by the route entry. | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->name(), "version"); | ||
| EXPECT_EQ((*it)->value().value().string_value(), "v3.1"); | ||
| } else { | ||
| ON_CALL(callbacks_.route_->route_entry_, metadataMatchCriteria()) | ||
| .WillByDefault(Return(nullptr)); | ||
|
|
||
| EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, router_->metadataMatchCriteria()); | ||
| } | ||
|
Comment on lines
+159
to
+228
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. So, where is the verify of metadata match criteria?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. test code coming soon
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. /updated |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| void initializeUpstreamZone() { | ||
| upstream_locality_.set_zone("other_zone_name"); | ||
| ON_CALL(*context_.cluster_manager_.thread_local_cluster_.tcp_conn_pool_.host_, locality()) | ||
|
|
@@ -706,6 +796,42 @@ TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, NoCluster) { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1U, context_.scope().counterFromString("test.unknown_cluster").value()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Test the case where both dynamic metadata match criteria | ||
| // and route metadata match criteria is not empty. | ||
| TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, MetadataMatchCriteriaFromRequest) { | ||
|
xiaoma2015 marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
| initializeRouter(); | ||
| initializeMetadata(MessageType::Call); | ||
|
|
||
| verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRequest(true); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Test the case where route metadata match criteria is empty | ||
| // but with non-empty dynamic metadata match criteria. | ||
| TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, MetadataMatchCriteriaFromRequestNoRouteEntryMatch) { | ||
|
xiaoma2015 marked this conversation as resolved.
|
||
| initializeRouter(); | ||
| initializeMetadata(MessageType::Call); | ||
|
|
||
| verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRequest(false); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Test the case where dynamic metadata match criteria is empty | ||
| // but with non-empty route metadata match criteria. | ||
| TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, MetadataMatchCriteriaFromRoute) { | ||
| initializeRouter(); | ||
| startRequest(MessageType::Call); | ||
|
|
||
| verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRoute(true); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Test the case where both dynamic metadata match criteria | ||
| // and route metadata match criteria is empty. | ||
| TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, MetadataMatchCriteriaFromRouteNoRouteEntryMatch) { | ||
| initializeRouter(); | ||
| startRequest(MessageType::Call); | ||
|
|
||
| verifyMetadataMatchCriteriaFromRoute(false); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| TEST_F(ThriftRouterTest, ClusterMaintenanceMode) { | ||
| initializeRouter(); | ||
| initializeMetadata(MessageType::Call); | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit - I think it should be just:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
got it