Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for more detailed metadce expectations #8583

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2019

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented May 10, 2019

Includes support for automatically updating the expectation files.

Initial this is only for the "sent" functions, but can be extended
to imports and exports later.

Includes support for automatically updating the expectation files.

Initial this is only for the "sent" functions, but can be extended
to imports and exports later.
@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from kripken May 10, 2019 19:30
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit d449897 into incoming May 10, 2019
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the metadce_expectations branch May 10, 2019 23:39
VirtualTim pushed a commit to VirtualTim/emscripten that referenced this pull request May 21, 2019
)

Includes support for automatically updating the expectation files.

Initial this is only for the "sent" functions, but can be extended
to imports and exports later.
VirtualTim added a commit to VirtualTim/emscripten that referenced this pull request May 23, 2019
VirtualTim added a commit to VirtualTim/emscripten that referenced this pull request May 23, 2019
belraquib pushed a commit to belraquib/emscripten that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2020
)

Includes support for automatically updating the expectation files.

Initial this is only for the "sent" functions, but can be extended
to imports and exports later.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants