Skip to content

docs(audits): re-audit IDSD with full article content #118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
emeraldleaf merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2026
Merged

docs(audits): re-audit IDSD with full article content #118

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .claude/audits/INDEX.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ Persistent log of every `/article-audit` run. One row per audit; full reasoning
| 2026-06-03 | [Git commands every engineer should know](2026-06-03-git-commands-reference.md) (Pavle Davitković) + Anton Martyniuk's rebase-on-shared-branches comment | 🔧 Anton's rule (rebase-vs-merge) followed by behavior, no encoding | Opened #105 (after user pushback on initial "no action" verdict) |
| 2026-06-03 | [IServiceScopeFactory vs IServiceProvider](2026-06-03-iservicescope-vs-iserviceprovider.md) (LinkedIn DI lifetimes comment follow-up) | 🔧 Partial — mechanism in #103, IServiceProvider anti-pattern not yet | Update #103 body |
| 2026-06-05 | [10 harmful .NET packages](2026-06-05-harmful-dotnet-packages.md) (LinkedIn listicle) | ⚙️ 8 of 10 already encoded equivalently; load-bearing disagreement on NSubstitute (article says replace with Moq, project explicitly rejects Moq); tactical divergence on FluentAssertions replacement (project chose AwesomeAssertions fork over article's Shouldly/xUnit) | No action |
| 2026-06-05 | [The Method That Replaces SDD — IDSD](2026-06-05-idsd-replaces-sdd.md) (Kapil Viren Ahuja, Activated Thinker) | ❓ Paywalled — visible intro corroborates project's encoding-loop stance; IDSD methodology itself unauditable | No action; follow-up if article becomes accessible |
| 2026-06-05 | [The Method That Replaces SDD — IDSD](2026-06-05-idsd-replaces-sdd.md) (Kapil Viren Ahuja, Activated Thinker) | ⚙️ **Parallel methodology with complementary scope** — IDSD addresses per-feature loop (Intent + Expectations + Context), encoding loop addresses cross-feature compounding. Re-audited after user pasted full article (initial verdict was paywall-limited). 5 borrowable framings identified | Propose 5 method additions: "Connections" section in /feature-spec, hole-test, "presence in loop" discipline, "method vs harness" doc, academic citations |
Loading