feat: Add citar-pdf.el #490
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Actually, this probably is premature.
I was just realizing one could adapt
consult-ripgrepto useripgrep-allinstead, and the performance is much better. Except, it doesn't appear you can open the file from the candidate.This adds the
citar-pdf-search-contentscommand from #477, in its own file, both to separately handle dependencies, but also with the idea to leave room for adding other functions here in time.An issue is that I'm not sure what ATM what might be reasonably added in the future. Maybe something related to org-noter? Might be this is premature without that settled?