Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request involves modifications to the rule management functionality across several files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts (2)
13-13: Organize and Optimize ImportsThe imports in this file can be better organized for readability. Group related imports together and remove any unused imports to keep the code clean and maintainable.
258-268: Return Consistent Error ResponsesIn
deleteRuleAction, when a rule is not found or the user lacks permission, the function either returns nothing or an error object. For consistency, always return a standardized error response.Modify the code:
if (!rule) return { error: "Rule not found" }; if (rule.userId !== session.user.id) return { error: "Unauthorized access" };apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-prompt-on-delete-rule.ts (1)
31-52: Review Clarity of AI InstructionsThe instructions provided to the AI assistant are clear but can be refined for brevity.
For example, combine similar steps or remove unnecessary details to make the instructions more concise.
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.ts (1)
9-35: Consider adding input validation for rule conditions.While the condition handling is comprehensive, consider adding validation for potentially problematic inputs:
- Empty strings in conditions
- Special characters that might need escaping
- Maximum length limits for conditions
if (rule.from) conditions.push(`from "${rule.from}"`); +if (rule.from?.trim()) conditions.push(`from "${escapeString(rule.from)}"`); function escapeString(str: string): string { return str.replace(/["\\]/g, '\\$&'); }apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.test.ts (1)
5-212: Add test cases for edge cases and error scenarios.The test suite is comprehensive but could be enhanced with additional test cases:
- Empty or whitespace-only strings in conditions
- Very long strings in conditions
- Invalid URLs in webhook actions
- Malformed templates in reply actions
Example test case:
it("handles empty and whitespace-only conditions", () => { const rule = { from: " ", subject: "", actions: [{ type: "ARCHIVE" }] as Action[], } as Rule & { actions: Action[] }; expect(createPromptFromRule(rule)).toBe("For all emails, archive"); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/Rules.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts(0 hunks)apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts(9 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.test.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-prompt-on-delete-rule.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-prompt-on-update-rule.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts (4)
122-122: Ensure Correct Retrieval of Current RuleWhen fetching the
currentRuleinupdateRuleAction, confirm that theincludeclause retrieves all necessary related data, as it is crucial for accurate prompt updates later in the function.
134-134: Validate Updated Rule DataAfter the Prisma transaction, only the first element is assigned to
updatedRule. Ensure that this element indeed contains the updated rule with all expected relations included.Double-check the transaction array to confirm that
updatedRuleis correctly obtained.
286-306: Handle Potential Errors in Prompt UpdateAfter generating the
updatedPrompt, there is no error handling for the subsequent database update. Failure to update the user prompt could go unnoticed.Implement error handling:
try { await prisma.user.update({ where: { id: session.user.id }, data: { rulesPrompt: updatedPrompt }, }); } catch (error) { // Handle or log the error appropriately }
87-91: Handle Errors When Updating User PromptIn
createRuleAction, the asynchronous call toupdateUserPromptlacks error handling. If updating the user's prompt fails, the error will go unnoticed, potentially causing inconsistencies.Consider adding a try-catch block around
updateUserPromptto handle any exceptions:try { await updateUserPrompt(session.user.id, prompt); } catch (error) { // Handle or log the error appropriately }apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-prompt-on-delete-rule.ts (2)
28-30: Handle Empty Prompt ScenariosWhen
existingPromptordeletedRulePromptis empty, the function returns an empty string. This could lead to unintended behavior if the calling code doesn't anticipate it.Consider throwing an error or handling this case explicitly. Ensure the calling function can handle an empty string appropriately.
56-65: Add Error Handling for AI ResponseThe function assumes that
chatCompletionObjectwill return a valid response. If the AI service fails or returns an unexpected format, it might cause issues.Implement error handling to manage exceptions or invalid responses from the AI service.
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-prompt-on-update-rule.ts (2)
31-33: Handle Missing Prompts AppropriatelySimilar to the delete rule function, ensure that when
existingPromptorupdatedRulePromptis missing, the function handles it appropriately.Decide whether to throw an error or handle the empty return value in the calling code.
60-69: Include Error Handling for AI Service CallAs with the other AI-related function, add error handling around the
chatCompletionObjectcall to catch any exceptions or invalid responses.Example:
let parsedResponse; try { const aiResponse = await chatCompletionObject({ /* params */ }); parsedResponse = aiResponse.object; } catch (error) { // Handle or log the error appropriately }apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
RuleWithRelationstype properly extends the baseRuletype with necessary relationships for actions, category filters, and groups.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/Rules.tsx (1)
40-40: LGTM! Correct import path update.The import path for
deleteRuleActionhas been properly updated to reflect the new location of the function.
| // update prompt file | ||
| await updatePromptFileOnUpdate(session.user.id, currentRule, updatedRule); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling for Prompt Update
In updateRuleAction, the call to updatePromptFileOnUpdate doesn't handle potential errors. If the prompt update fails, this could lead to inconsistent state without any notification.
Implement error handling:
try {
await updatePromptFileOnUpdate(session.user.id, currentRule, updatedRule);
} catch (error) {
// Handle or log the error appropriately
}| const currentRule = await prisma.rule.findUnique({ | ||
| where: { id: body.id, userId: session.user.id }, | ||
| include: { actions: true, categoryFilters: true, group: true }, | ||
| }); | ||
| if (!currentRule) return { error: "Rule not found" }; | ||
|
|
||
| const updatedRule = await prisma.rule.update({ | ||
| where: { id: body.id, userId: session.user.id }, | ||
| data: { instructions: body.instructions }, | ||
| include: { actions: true, categoryFilters: true, group: true }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // update prompt file | ||
| await updatePromptFileOnUpdate(session.user.id, currentRule, updatedRule); | ||
|
|
||
| revalidatePath(`/automation/rule/${body.id}`); | ||
| revalidatePath("/automation"); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Consistent Return Values
The updateRuleInstructionsAction function lacks a return statement. For consistency and to facilitate error handling on the client side, consider returning a response.
Add a return statement at the end of the function:
return { success: true };
1 participant
when rules are manually updated we now update the prompt file too
Summary by CodeRabbit
Code Refactoring
deleteRuleActionfromai-rule.tstorule.tsRules.tsxto reflect the new action locationNew Features
Improvements