Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces support for Google's AI models by expanding the existing AI provider configuration. The changes involve updating configuration files, validation schemas, and utility functions to include Google's Gemini models. The modifications allow users to select Google as an AI provider, with support for two models: Gemini 1.5 Pro and Gemini 1.5 Flash. The implementation maintains the existing error handling and validation logic while providing more flexibility in AI model selection. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Settings
participant AIProvider
participant ModelSelector
User->>Settings: Select Google Provider
Settings->>ModelSelector: Validate Provider
ModelSelector-->>Settings: Validate Success
Settings->>AIProvider: Configure Google AI
AIProvider-->>Settings: Confirm Configuration
Settings->>User: Save Settings Confirmed
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
307-347: Add Google-specific error handling.The
handleErrorfunction handles specific error cases for OpenAI and Anthropic, but lacks Google-specific error handling. Consider adding error handling for Google API-specific errors.Example implementation:
async function handleError(error: unknown, userEmail: string) { if (APICallError.isInstance(error)) { + if (isGoogleAPIError(error)) { + return await addUserErrorMessage( + userEmail, + ErrorType.GOOGLE_API_ERROR, + error.message, + ); + } + if (isIncorrectOpenAIAPIKeyError(error)) { // ... existing code } // ... rest of the error handling } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts (1)
19-20: Consider versioning strategy for Gemini models.Using "latest" in model identifiers might cause issues with version tracking and reproducibility. Consider using specific version identifiers like we do with Claude models (e.g., "gemini-1.5-pro-20240101").
apps/web/utils/usage.ts (1)
106-106: Fix typo in function name.The function name
calcuateCostcontains a typo and should becalculateCost.-function calcuateCost( +function calculateCost(
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
apps/web/app/api/user/settings/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/settings/validation.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-rules-prompt.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/utils/usage.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-rules-prompt.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/web/app/api/user/settings/validation.ts (1)
6-11: LGTM! Provider enum extension is well-implemented.The addition of
Provider.GOOGLEand conditional inclusion ofProvider.OLLAMAmaintains proper type safety while extending provider support.apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts (1)
45-54: LGTM! Model options are well-structured.The model options for Google provider are properly configured with clear labels.
apps/web/utils/usage.ts (1)
94-103: LGTM! Cost calculations are accurate and well-documented.The pricing implementation for Gemini models is correct and includes helpful reference URLs.
apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM! Import statement is properly placed.The import for Google's AI SDK is correctly positioned alongside other provider imports.
74-83: Verify error handling for Google API key.The implementation looks good and follows the established pattern. However, let's verify the error handling behavior is consistent with other providers.
Run this script to check error handling consistency across providers:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling for Google API key is appropriate and consistent
The implementation correctly validates the API key requirement, similar to how other providers handle their specific authentication needs:
- OpenAI falls back to environment variables
- Anthropic has dual-path validation for direct API or Bedrock credentials
- Google requires an explicit API key
- Ollama uses a different authentication mechanism
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check error handling patterns across providers # Look for error handling patterns in the codebase # Check error handling patterns rg -A 2 "throw new Error\(.*API key.*\)" # Check if Google-specific errors are handled in error utility functions rg -l "isGoogleError|GoogleError"Length of output: 1297
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get all provider implementations in the LLM utils ast-grep --pattern 'if (provider === $_) { $$$ }' # Also check for any provider-specific error handling rg -A 5 "provider === " apps/web/utils/llms/index.tsLength of output: 3933
apps/web/package.json (1)
18-18: Verify @ai-sdk/google package version.The package is correctly added, but let's verify if 1.0.12 is the latest stable version and check for any known security issues.
| case Provider.GOOGLE: | ||
| return options.aiModel || Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO; | ||
| case Provider.OLLAMA: | ||
| return Model.OLLAMA; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add model validation for Google provider.
While the default model is appropriate, consider validating that options.aiModel is a valid Google model when provided to prevent runtime errors.
case Provider.GOOGLE:
- return options.aiModel || Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO;
+ const model = options.aiModel || Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO;
+ if (![Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO, Model.GEMINI_1_5_FLASH].includes(model)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid Google model");
+ }
+ return model;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| case Provider.GOOGLE: | |
| return options.aiModel || Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO; | |
| case Provider.OLLAMA: | |
| return Model.OLLAMA; | |
| case Provider.GOOGLE: | |
| const model = options.aiModel || Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO; | |
| if (![Model.GEMINI_1_5_PRO, Model.GEMINI_1_5_FLASH].includes(model)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid Google model"); | |
| } | |
| return model; | |
| case Provider.OLLAMA: | |
| return Model.OLLAMA; |
1 participant
Closes: #82
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependencies
@ai-sdk/googlepackageImprovements