Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@elie222 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 39 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant enhancements to the automation and onboarding functionalities within the web application. Key changes include the addition of a Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant RulesPrompt
participant PersonaDialog
participant ButtonList
User->>RulesPrompt: Open Prompt Generation
RulesPrompt->>PersonaDialog: Open Persona Selection
User->>PersonaDialog: Select Persona
PersonaDialog-->>RulesPrompt: Update Persona
RulesPrompt->>ButtonList: Display Prompt Options
User->>ButtonList: Select Prompt
ButtonList-->>RulesPrompt: Generate Prompt
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/PersonaDialog.tsx (1)
16-37: Good UX consideration with immediate persona selection closure.Invoking
onSelect(id)andsetIsOpen(false)in quick succession provides a seamless user experience. Also, passing an emptyemptyMessagestring avoids clutter.If you anticipate no personas available in the future, consider adding a more descriptive empty message or fallback to guide the user.
apps/web/components/ButtonList.tsx (1)
20-54: Effective use of grid layout for button rendering.Dynamically switching grid layouts based on the
columnsprop is a nice implementation detail.Consider robust fallback handling (e.g., default to 1 column when
columnsis outside known bounds) or a more flexible approach (e.g., a numeric class generation) if you plan to allow more column counts in the future.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (1)
107-110: Reset logic for persona updates.Using
resetwheneverpersonaPromptchanges nicely updates the form. This is a neat approach, though be mindful that it might override any user text if the user is typing while switching personas.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts (4)
1-8: Encapsulate repeated concepts in a shared resource.
These lines look good, but note that repeated instructions (e.g., labeling and archiving) also appear within other persona prompts. Consider centralizing any frequently repeated actions to improve maintainability.
12-30: Watch out for duplicating instructions.
The"Label receipts as \"Receipt\""prompt appears twice (here and incommonPrompts). If this duplication is unintentional, consider removing or consolidating it. Otherwise, clarify its purpose to avoid confusion.
148-169: Potential overlap in instructions.
Some items in the recruiter persona (e.g., “recruiters” or “job interviews”) could conflict with instructions incommonPrompts. For clarity, confirm that you don’t need to unify or override them if they appear in both places.
196-203: LeveragecommonPromptseffectively.
For the"reachout"and"other"personas, you might benefit by combining more shared instructions fromcommonPromptsto avoid scattering similar logic across multiple persona configurations.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ReportMistake.tsx (1)
361-368: Minor optimization consideration for theButtonListitems.
Filtering the rules array inline is straightforward, but if the rules array becomes large, consider memoizing the filtered array for performance.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/AutomationOnboarding.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/PersonaDialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ReportMistake.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx(5 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/page.tsx(0 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/components/ButtonList.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/page.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingEmailAssistant.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (19)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/PersonaDialog.tsx (2)
1-6: Great use of imports and "use client" directive.It’s good to see that the file declares
"use client"at the top and imports necessary components. This ensures that the component renders properly on the client side without confusion.
7-15: Well-defined prop types.The prop signatures (
isOpen,setIsOpen,onSelect) are strongly typed and clear. This should help maintain clarity and correctness throughout the codebase.apps/web/components/ButtonList.tsx (2)
6-9: Concise item definition.Defining
ButtonListItemwithidandnamekeeps things simple and straightforward.
11-18: Flexible props for ButtonList.Allowing an optional title, selectedId, columns, and an emptyMessage provides a versatile component for multiple use cases.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/AutomationOnboarding.tsx (2)
15-19: Optional callback nicely introduced.Adding
onCompleteto the function signature provides a clean extensibility point for any post-onboarding step.
48-54: Order of operations may warrant a review.Invoking
onComplete();beforeonClose();is fine if you intend the completion logic to run fully while the dialog is still visible. However, ifonCompletetriggers asynchronous side effects, ensure that closing the dialog immediately does not interrupt or overshadow the user feedback flow.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (10)
3-3: Thoughtful addition of React hooks.Your import of
useEffect,useState, anduseCallbackindicates a well-structured approach to managing UI state and side effects in a growing component.
35-38: Nicely organized aggregator import statements.Bundling
examplePromptsandpersonasfromexamples.tsconsolidates references in one place, optimizing code readability.
46-49: Modal logic is straightforward.Managing the modal open state with
useModaland a callback for toggling is clear. This simplifies controlling thePersonaDialog.
51-55: Persona state usage.Storing
personain state and dynamically computingpersonaPromptkeeps data flow minimal and direct. The optional chaining of persona prompt helps prevent undefined errors.
58-67: Integrating persona selection with form.Passing both
rulesPromptandpersonaPromptto theRulesPromptFormcovers the scenario where a user chooses a persona or manually enters prompts. This is user-friendly and well-structured.
68-71: Reusing the modal for persona selection.Displaying
PersonaDialogoutsideRulesPromptFormbut still controlling its state from the same component is a good approach to keep concerns separated while sharing the state logically.
79-86: Extended signature for RulesPromptForm.Introducing the
personaPromptandonOpenPersonaDialogprops is consistent with the code changes. Nice addition to keep the form’s UI relevant to the persona flow.
102-102: Multiple form states are nicely tracked.Combining
isSubmitting&isGeneratingwith the react-hook-form state covers potential edge cases where user actions overlap. This ensures a robust user experience.
214-214: Clear example prompt content.Providing realistic instructions about labeling emails and forwarding them is a user-friendly example. Encouraging the user to adapt or add more rules fosters a good onboarding experience.
275-278: Persona selection action is consistent.Adding “Choose persona” with
UserPenIconis a small but effective UI element giving more context to the persona-based workflow.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts (1)
69-71: Verify reusingfounderPromptforassistant.
Here, theassistantpersona references thefounderPrompt. Ensure that this is desired—otherwise, consider providing a distinct prompt tailored to an assistant’s responsibilities.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ReportMistake.tsx (2)
17-17: NewButtonListimport looks good.
No issues with importingButtonList. This improves maintainability by reusing shared UI logic.
49-49: Imported action is consistent with usage.
The import ofaddGroupItemActionaligns with its usage in theGroupMismatchcomponent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (1)
206-217: Contextual placeholder referencing "personas.other.prompt".
Incorporating an example referencingpersonas.other.promptis a neat way to guide users. Consider providing more detail on how the placeholder will differ when an actual persona is chosen.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts (2)
12-30: Flexibility for general usage.
examplePromptsmerges standard labeling with scenario-specific rules, providing a rich set of references. Keep an eye on overlap or redundancy to maintain clarity.
43-203: Comprehensive persona definitions.
Each persona includes highly detailed labeling and response instructions. This thorough structure is beneficial but may need occasional trimming or refactoring to avoid overly large prompts if more personas are added. Consider grouping repeated instructions or moving them into a shared base.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx(5 hunks)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-rules-prompt.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/generate-rules-prompt.ts (1)
135-135: Consider verifying downstream usage of the<email>tag.
Changing<snippet>to<email>shifts the semantic meaning of this output. If other parts of the code rely on<snippet>for processing, this may cause unexpected behavior. Please ensure all references are updated accordingly.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/RulesPrompt.tsx (8)
3-4: Imports look good, but confirm any unused dependencies.
The newly imported modules likeUserPenIcon,AutomationOnboarding,PersonaDialog, anduseModalare relevant to your new persona selection flow. Verify that each is actively used to avoid retaining dead code.Also applies to: 35-38
46-50: Good approach for managing modal state.
Using a modal hook to manageisModalOpenandsetIsModalOpenis straightforward and keeps the state localized. This pattern is clear and maintainable.
58-67: Good integration of personaPrompt into RulesPromptForm.
Connecting the persona-driven prompt to the data prop is well-structured. This encapsulation simplifies the form’s logic by centralizing persona updates in one place.
68-73: Persona dialog usage is clear.
UsingPersonaDialogafter the onboarding is a neat way to extend the user flow. Confirm that the UI transitions are intuitive and consider user feedback if adjustments are needed.
79-86: Extended form props provide useful flexibility.
The additionalpersonaPromptandonOpenPersonaDialogprops give the form direct control over persona logic, which can simplify code organization and improve testability.
102-111: Resetting the form values on persona change.
ThisuseEffectproperly synchronizes the form state with thepersonaPrompt. Verify that re-entered text isn't inadvertently lost if the user changes persona mid-edit.
276-280: Clear CTA for persona selection.
This button effectively prompts users to choose a persona. The "UserPenIcon" aligns with a user profile concept. Confirm if tooltips or additional instructions would further clarify the persona feature’s benefits.
51-55: Ensure persona keys match thepersonasobject.
Relying onpersonas[persona as keyof typeof personas]?.promptcould lead to undefined prompts if the key is invalid. Consider defensive checks or default fallbacks if persona is unrecognized.+const personaPrompt = persona && persona in personas + ? personas[persona as keyof typeof personas]?.prompt + : undefined;apps/web/app/(app)/automation/examples.ts (2)
1-10: Shared prompts are well-structured.
DefiningcommonPromptsand then converting them to a single stringcommonis a clean approach for reuse.
32-41: Founder's persona prompt effectively extendscommon.
Combining the shared rules with founder-specific instructions is concise and modular. This makes it easy to maintain persona-specific expansions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ButtonListcomponent for improved user interface interactions.Improvements
Changes
AutomationOnboardingandClientOnlyfrom the main automation page.