Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
🔍 Existing Issues For ReviewYour pull request is modifying functions with the following pre-existing issues: 📄 File: apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx
📄 File: apps/web/utils/condition.ts (Click to Expand)
Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎 |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to rule creation and category management across multiple components. The changes focus on expanding the functionality of creating automation rules by adding support for category-specific rule generation. The modifications include updating type signatures, introducing new parameters for rule creation, and improving the handling of category-based conditions and filters. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GroupedTable
participant CreateRulePage
participant ConditionUtils
User->>GroupedTable: Select Category
GroupedTable->>CreateRulePage: Pass categoryId
CreateRulePage->>ConditionUtils: Generate Condition
ConditionUtils-->>CreateRulePage: Return Condition with Category
CreateRulePage->>CreateRulePage: Create Rule with Category
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/components/GroupedTable.tsx (1)
369-377: Consider accessibility improvements for the "Attach rule" button.While the implementation is functionally correct, consider enhancing accessibility.
-<Button variant="outline" size="xs" asChild> +<Button variant="outline" size="xs" asChild aria-label={`Attach rule to ${category} category`}> <Link href={`/automation/rule/create?tab=${RuleType.CATEGORY}&categoryId=${categoryId}&label=${category}`} target="_blank" > <PlusIcon className="mr-2 size-4" /> Attach rule </Link> </Button>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/components/GroupedTable.tsx(5 hunks)apps/web/utils/condition.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx (2)
9-15: LGTM! Type signature update is well-structured.
The searchParams interface is properly typed with optional parameters for categoryId and label.
26-46: Verify rule name uniqueness.
While the rule construction logic is sound, using a simple prefix "Label " for the rule name might lead to naming conflicts if multiple rules are created for the same label.
Consider making the rule name more unique by including additional context:
-name: searchParams.label ? `Label ${searchParams.label}` : "",
+name: searchParams.label ? `Label rule for ${searchParams.label} category` : "",
apps/web/utils/condition.ts (1)
133-133: LGTM! Category condition handling is well-implemented.
The implementation correctly:
- Accepts an optional category parameter
- Sets appropriate defaults for categoryFilterType
- Handles null case for categoryFilters
Also applies to: 146-150
apps/web/components/GroupedTable.tsx (2)
79-90: LGTM! Efficient category lookup implementation.
The categoryMap implementation using useMemo is a good performance optimization for quick ID lookups.
331-339: LGTM! Props interface update is well-typed.
The GroupRow component's props interface is properly updated to include the required categoryId parameter.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit