Conversation
|
@pastetreee is attempting to deploy a commit to the Inbox Zero Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the AI settings functionality by adding support for a new provider, GROQ, in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts (1)
4-4: Consider adding JSDoc comments for new additions.To improve maintainability, consider adding JSDoc comments describing:
- The GROQ provider's capabilities and requirements
- The Llama 3 70B model's specifications and use cases
Example:
+/** Groq AI provider for high-performance LLM inference */ GROQ: "groq", +/** Llama 3 70B model optimized for tool use (preview version) */ LLAMA_3_70B_GROQ: "llama3-groq-70b-8192-tool-use-preview",Also applies to: 12-12
apps/web/utils/error.ts (1)
99-118: Add documentation for Groq error messages.The implementation looks good and follows the established pattern. However, consider adding documentation to clarify the source and reliability of these error message patterns.
Consider these improvements:
+// Error messages from Groq API documentation: https://console.groq.com/docs/errors export function isGroqInvalidApiKeyError(error: APICallError): boolean { return ( error.message.includes("Invalid API key") || error.message.includes("Authentication failed") ); }
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
apps/web/utils/error.ts (1)
131-134: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring error checks for better maintainability.
The integration is correct, but as we add more providers, the
isKnownApiErrorfunction is growing in complexity.Consider grouping provider-specific checks into separate functions:
+function isKnownGroqError(error: APICallError): boolean { + return ( + isGroqInvalidApiKeyError(error) || + isGroqRateLimitError(error) || + isGroqQuotaExceededError(error) + ); +} export function isKnownApiError(error: unknown): boolean { return ( isGmailInsufficientPermissionsError(error) || isGmailRateLimitExceededError(error) || isGmailQuotaExceededError(error) || isOpenAIQuotaExceededError(error) || (APICallError.isInstance(error) && (isIncorrectOpenAIAPIKeyError(error) || isInvalidOpenAIModelError(error) || isOpenAIAPIKeyDeactivatedError(error) || isOpenAIRetryError(error) || isAnthropicInsufficientBalanceError(error) || - isGroqInvalidApiKeyError(error) || - isGroqRateLimitError(error) || - isGroqQuotaExceededError(error))) + isKnownGroqError(error))) ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.function isKnownGroqError(error: APICallError): boolean { return ( isGroqInvalidApiKeyError(error) || isGroqRateLimitError(error) || isGroqQuotaExceededError(error) ); } export function isKnownApiError(error: unknown): boolean { return ( isGmailInsufficientPermissionsError(error) || isGmailRateLimitExceededError(error) || isGmailQuotaExceededError(error) || isOpenAIQuotaExceededError(error) || (APICallError.isInstance(error) && (isIncorrectOpenAIAPIKeyError(error) || isInvalidOpenAIModelError(error) || isOpenAIAPIKeyDeactivatedError(error) || isOpenAIRetryError(error) || isAnthropicInsufficientBalanceError(error) || isKnownGroqError(error))) ); }apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts (1)
70-77:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd API key validation for GROQ provider
The GROQ implementation should validate the API key's presence, similar to how the BEDROCK credentials are checked. Consider adding:
if (provider === Provider.GROQ) { + if (!aiApiKey && !env.GROQ_API_KEY) { + throw new Error("GROQ_API_KEY is not set"); + } const model = aiModel || Model.LLAMA_3_70B_GROQ; return { provider: Provider.GROQ, model, llmModel: createGroq({ apiKey: aiApiKey || env.GROQ_API_KEY })(model), }; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (provider === Provider.GROQ) { if (!aiApiKey && !env.GROQ_API_KEY) { throw new Error("GROQ_API_KEY is not set"); } const model = aiModel || Model.LLAMA_3_70B_GROQ; return { provider: Provider.GROQ, model, llmModel: createGroq({ apiKey: aiApiKey || env.GROQ_API_KEY })(model), }; }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/.env.example (1)
12-13: LGTM! Consider adding a descriptive comment.The
GROQ_API_KEYvariable is correctly positioned with other AI provider credentials and follows the established format.Add a comment to explain where users can obtain this API key:
OPENAI_API_KEY= +# Get your API key from https://console.groq.com/keys GROQ_API_KEY= BEDROCK_ACCESS_KEY=
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
apps/web/.env.example(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/settings/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/error.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- apps/web/app/api/user/settings/route.ts
- apps/web/package.json
- apps/web/utils/error.ts
- apps/web/utils/llms/config.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/utils/llms/index.ts (3)
11-11: LGTM! Import follows established patterns.
The import statement for the GROQ provider follows the same convention as other AI SDK provider imports.
69-76: LGTM! Implementation follows established patterns.
The GROQ provider implementation follows the same structure as other providers, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
69-76: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding GROQ-specific error handling.
The implementation would benefit from:
- GROQ API key validation
- GROQ-specific error handling in the
handleErrorfunction - Documentation about the GROQ_API_KEY requirement
Let's check if GROQ error handling exists in the error utils:
Consider adding GROQ error handling similar to other providers:
// In error.ts
export function isGroqAPIKeyError(error: unknown) {
return error instanceof APICallError && error.message.includes("Invalid API key");
}
// In this file
if (isGroqAPIKeyError(error)) {
return await addUserErrorMessage(
userEmail,
ErrorType.INCORRECT_GROQ_API_KEY,
error.message
);
}2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
GROQ_API_KEY.These updates enhance the functionality and reliability of AI settings within the application.