-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a modernizr check for WebAssembly support #27776
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is sufficient, I believe rust crypto needs the modern API for loading it also. e.g. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/WebAssembly/JavaScript_interface/instantiateStreaming_static rather than https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/WebAssembly/JavaScript_interface/instantiate_static (FF 58 vs FF 52)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it actually doesn't, because it seems the lowest-common-denominator way was the only reliable way of loading it portably, so it actually uses
WebAssembly.instantiate()
in practice. We could certainly try loading a simple module using that: that would cover CSP issues too, but we'd be assuming more details of how the library works, which could change without us knowing so we could end up saying it won't work even when it actually would.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What @dbkr says is true: we wanted to package the wasm blob in a way that it could be loaded by applications using the js-sdk without a whole lot of custom packaging. Doing that, whilst allowing EW to stream it, seemed approximately impossible at the time, mostly because everything in the JS ecosystem is awful. Hence, we use
WebAssembly.instantiate
rather thanWebAssembly.instantiateStreaming
.(It may be worth revisiting that situation now that we have Webpack 5 and the JS-SDK is built as ES modules, but I digress.)
What we do do is use
WebAssembly.instantiate
rather than calling theWebAssembly.Module
constructor, which loads the wasm synchronously. But both methods seems to have landed in the same version of FF, so I don't think it makes any difference.