-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 731
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure clearWith lambda is deleting all the list item #6392
Conversation
…et an infinite loop. This specific error will help to figure out what is happening.
first()?.let { delete.invoke(it) } | ||
if (previousSize != size + 1) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this be previousSize == size
? (to highlight no deletion has occurred)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see your point, but I expect previousSize == size + 1
to be the only valid condition, so I think it's better like that.
We may have lambda which add object(s) to the list, or delete multiple objects, we live in a crazy world!
This will be possible to delete another item than the provide one in the lambda, for instance the last one, but at the end this will have the same result.
Another solution to avoid that would have to change the Extension to:
internal fun <T : RealmObject /* <- Needed contract to be able to use `isValid` */> RealmList<T>.clearWith(delete: (T) -> Unit) {
while (!isEmpty()) {
first()?.let {
delete.invoke(it)
if (it.isValid) {
// Object has not been deleted
error("`clearWith` MUST delete all elements of the RealmList")
}
}
}
}
or even just delete it with a warning:
internal fun <T : RealmObject /* <- Needed contract to be able to use `isValid` */> RealmList<T>.clearWith(delete: (T) -> Unit) {
while (!isEmpty()) {
first()?.let {
delete.invoke(it)
if (it.isValid) {
// Object has not been deleted
Timber.w("`clearWith` MUST delete all elements of the RealmList")
it.deleteFromRealm()
}
}
}
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for explaining 👍 if possible I'd prefer for us to avoid the while
entirely as that seems to be the root of our problem
fun RealmList<T>.clearWith(delete: (T) -> Unit) {
map { item ->
{ delete(item) }
}.forEach { it.invoke() }
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add that just with the signature of the method, we are not sure the provided lambda will be a deleting action, we could pass any action on a type T
that just do nothing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not think we can use map
, because the RealmList is getting empty while we call deleteFromRealm()
on its items. This is not really Kotlin logic.
I will add some Kdoc on the fun.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh i understand your code with map
better now, have read too fast. It may work. Let me give it a try.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/** | ||
* throw in debug, only log in production. As this method does not always throw, next statement should be a return | ||
*/ | ||
internal fun fatalError(message: String) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
e4376bd
to
a0025bc
Compare
lambda.invoke() | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (!isEmpty()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we use isNotEmpty()
to improve readability?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the update!
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. |
Else we will get an infinite loop. This specific error will help to figure out what is happening.
Tested locally with a Realm schema upgrade:
And got this crash with stacktrace in log:
With this code:
No crash is observed and the DB is properly migrated.