Skip to content

Comments

Add queries for LOOKUP JOIN with filters on lookup table attributes#834

Merged
luigidellaquila merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
luigidellaquila:esql/joins_take_2
Aug 20, 2025
Merged

Add queries for LOOKUP JOIN with filters on lookup table attributes#834
luigidellaquila merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
luigidellaquila:esql/joins_take_2

Conversation

@luigidellaquila
Copy link
Contributor

Adding some queries to ES|QL LOOKUP JOIN tracks, to test WHERE filters on attributes coming from the lookup tables, eg.

FROM join_base_idx 
| lookup join lookup_idx 
| where lookup_keyword == "foo"

Copy link
Member

@inqueue inqueue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@luigidellaquila luigidellaquila merged commit 8f18820 into elastic:master Aug 20, 2025
13 checks passed
@esbenchmachine esbenchmachine added the backport pending Awaiting backport to stable release branch label Dec 19, 2025
@esbenchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luigidellaquila
A backport is pending for this PR. Please add all required vX.Y version labels.

  • If it is intended for the current Elasticsearch release version, apply the corresponding version label.
  • If it also supports past released versions, add those labels too.
  • If it only targets a future version, wait until that version label exists and then add it.
    (Each rally-tracks version label is created during the feature freeze of a new Elasticsearch branch).

Backporting entails:

  1. Ensure the correct version labels exist in this PR.
  2. Ensure backport PRs have backport label and are passing tests.
  3. Merge backport PRs (you can approve yourself and enable auto-merge).
  4. Remove backport pending label from this PR once all backport PRs are merged.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport pending Awaiting backport to stable release branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants