Merged
Conversation
mtojek
reviewed
Mar 21, 2022
Contributor
mtojek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks good to me from the spec perspective, but as long as this change affects Kibana, I'm adding @joshdover as a reviewer.
james-elastic
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2022
mtojek
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2022
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Adds support for
kibana/osquery-pack-assetWhy is it important?
We want to be able to ship
osquery_pack_assetwithosquery_managerintegration, so the user can start using Osquery with the set of prebuilt packsChecklist
test/packagesthat prove my change is effective.versions/N/changelog.yml.Related issues
Relates elastic/integrations#2851
Relates elastic/kibana#128109