-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
Add support for specifying a constant_keyword value #194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,4 +3,7 @@ | |
| description: Event family | ||
| fields: | ||
| - name: category | ||
| external: ecs | ||
| external: ecs | ||
| - name: module | ||
| type: constant_keyword | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see that this is an inconsistency comparing to the original source - ECS repository, which defines it as Do we plan to adjust the ECS schema too ( This brings me to the final question - currently the import logic in elastic-package imports fields as they are defined. In this case (
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK there are plans at the moment to change the definition of // fyi: @elastic/ecs
I was expecting that packages would be required to declare their full definition of
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If you prefer you can leave overriding for further improvement (not to block this PR).
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've heard some discussion, but I'm not aware of a decision being made yet. I suggested allowing |
||
| value: good | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.