Skip to content

[backport] PR #7490 to 4.x - Build artifact names for unified release process#7809

Merged
epixa merged 1 commit into4.xfrom
jasper/backport/7490/4.x
Jul 22, 2016
Merged

[backport] PR #7490 to 4.x - Build artifact names for unified release process#7809
epixa merged 1 commit into4.xfrom
jasper/backport/7490/4.x

Conversation

@elastic-jasper
Copy link
Contributor

Backport PR #7490

Commit 1:
Build artifact names for unified release process

These changes are necessary for Kibana to be compatible with Elastic's
unified release process from 5.0 onward. The way artifacts get created
has not changed, but the naming conventions have.

Commit 2:
README is 5.0.0-alpha4 to match package.json

We bumped the version in package.json, but we never changed it in the
readme.

@elastic-jasper elastic-jasper added backport This PR is a backport of another PR has conflicts labels Jul 22, 2016
---------

**Commit 1:**
Build artifact names for unified release process

These changes are necessary for Kibana to be compatible with Elastic's
unified release process from 5.0 onward. The way artifacts get created
has not changed, but the naming conventions have.

* Original sha: c550bbc
* Authored by Court Ewing <court@epixa.com> on 2016-06-16T11:58:31Z

**Commit 2:**
README is 5.0.0-alpha4 to match package.json

We bumped the version in package.json, but we never changed it in the
readme.

* Original sha: 55c4993
* Authored by Court Ewing <court@epixa.com> on 2016-06-16T20:52:58Z
@epixa epixa force-pushed the jasper/backport/7490/4.x branch from 8f8ed0e to 2abfc65 Compare July 22, 2016 19:08
@epixa epixa merged commit 91386bd into 4.x Jul 22, 2016
@epixa epixa deleted the jasper/backport/7490/4.x branch July 22, 2016 19:26
@epixa epixa changed the title [backport] PR #7490 to 4.x [backport] PR #7490 to 4.x - Build artifact names for unified release process Jul 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport This PR is a backport of another PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants