[SIEM] Unskips and fixes 'Detection rules, custom' test#70693
[SIEM] Unskips and fixes 'Detection rules, custom' test#70693MadameSheema merged 5 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Test FailuresKibana Pipeline / kibana-xpack-agent / X-Pack Detection Engine API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/basic/tests/find_statuses·ts.detection engine api security and spaces enabled find_statuses "after each" hook for "should return a single rule status when a single rule is loaded from a find status with defaults added"Standard OutStack TraceBuild metrics
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
|
|
||
| export const totalNumberOfPrebuiltRulesInEsArchive = 127; | ||
|
|
||
| export const totalNumberOfPrebuiltRulesInEsArchiveCustomRule = 145; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe I'm dense, but the link between this name and the archive isn't super clear, here. Not a blocker, but perhaps we should qualify it with ...InCustomRuleWithTimelineArchive or something like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, totalNumberofPrebuildRulesInEsArchive is also unclear now for a similar reason: which archives does that number pertain to?
rylnd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The naming issues I mentioned aren't a blocker, but they should definitely be kept in mind for the future so as not to discourage contributions in this area of the codebase. That being said, thank you for fixing these!
* unskips and fixes 'Detection rules, custom' test * deletes comment Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
2 similar comments
|
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
3 similar comments
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
6 similar comments
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
|
Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution) |
Summary
In this PR we are unskiping and fixing "Detection rules, custom" test.