Skip to content

Conversation

@spalger
Copy link
Contributor

@spalger spalger commented Jan 10, 2019

This reverts #28369 and instead applies a suggestion from @joshdover to request the mappings with the type names included. This causes ES master to respond in the same format as it did a couple days ago so that we can unblock development while @chrisdavies works on longer-term fixes for ES v7 compatibility.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations

@spalger spalger changed the title Implement/fetch mappings with types [migrations] fetch mappings with types Jan 10, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisdavies chrisdavies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but the async function is not async, so I'd remove that.

@elasticmachine

This comment has been minimized.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@spalger spalger merged commit 8361b82 into elastic:master Jan 10, 2019
@spalger spalger deleted the implement/fetch-mappings-with-types branch January 10, 2019 18:12
tylersmalley pushed a commit to tylersmalley/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2019
Follow-up to elastic#28497

Since elastic/elasticsearch#37285 has been merged, it's
aparent there are a couple more places we need to specify include_type_name
as a stop-gap until elastic#23650 is completed

Signed-off-by: Tyler Smalley <[email protected]>
chrisdavies pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2019
* [migrations] Fetch additional mappings with types

Follow-up to #28497

Since elastic/elasticsearch#37285 has been merged, it's
aparent there are a couple more places we need to specify include_type_name
as a stop-gap until #23650 is completed

Signed-off-by: Tyler Smalley <[email protected]>

* Updates tests

Signed-off-by: Tyler Smalley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants