Add validation to block use of authorization headers with credentials in fleet download source config#255209
Merged
MichelLosier merged 3 commits intoelastic:mainfrom Feb 27, 2026
Conversation
…definitions for download source configs
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet) |
qn895
pushed a commit
to qn895/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
… in fleet download source config (elastic#255209) Resolves: elastic#254028 * Adds validation in the UI form and API handler for download source configuration to prevent defining of an `Authorization` custom header in combination with username:password or api key definitions.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Resolves: #254028
Authorizationcustom header in combination with username:password or api key definitions.Checklist
Check the PR satisfies following conditions.
Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.
release_note:breakinglabel should be applied in these situations.release_note:*label is applied per the guidelinesbackport:*labels.Identify risks
Does this PR introduce any risks? For example, consider risks like hard to test bugs, performance regression, potential of data loss.
Describe the risk, its severity, and mitigation for each identified risk. Invite stakeholders and evaluate how to proceed before merging.