[9.2] [APM] Migrate the Transaction Overview tests to Scout/Playwright/Component/API tests (#245972)#252497
Merged
sbelastic merged 1 commit intoelastic:9.2from Feb 10, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…onent/API tests (elastic#245972) Closes elastic#238515 Migrating transactions overview tests from Cypress to Scout Run server (first terminal): `node scripts/scout.js start-server --stateful` Run tests (second terminal): ` npx playwright test --project local --ui --config x-pack/solutions/observability/plugins/apm/test/scout/ui/parallel.playwright.config.ts ` Run server (first terminal): `node scripts/functional_tests_server --config x-pack/solutions/observability/test/api_integration_deployment_agnostic/configs/stateful/oblt.apm.stateful.config.ts` Run tests (second terminal): `node scripts/functional_test_runner --config x-pack/solutions/observability/test/api_integration_deployment_agnostic/configs/stateful/oblt.apm.stateful.config.ts --include=x-pack/solutions/observability/test/api_integration_deployment_agnostic/apis/apm/transactions/transactions_groups_order.spec.ts` <img width="1919" height="1122" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7167375c-879d-410a-912a-ab6581011fdf" /> Check the PR satisfies following conditions. Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well. - [x] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed --------- Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 23c0e3c)
botelastic
bot
added
the
Team:obs-presentation
1 task
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/obs-presentation-team (Team:obs-presentation) |
Member
jennypavlova
left a comment
jennypavlova
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well done, I added some questions/suggestions ⬇️
|
|
||
| // Verify detailed statistics contains data for all expected transaction names | ||
| const detailedStats = detailedStatisticsResponse.body; | ||
| if (detailedStats.currentPeriod) { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we avoid conditional tests?
|
|
||
| const serviceName = 'service-go'; | ||
| const start = new Date('2021-10-10T00:00:00.000Z').getTime(); | ||
| const end = new Date('2021-10-10T00:15:00.000Z').getTime() - 1; |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe a constant will make sense for the dates as they could be reused. Wdyt?
| await page.getByTestId('serviceGroupCard').click(); | ||
| await serviceGroupsPage.expectByText(['go services', 'synth-go-1', 'synth-go-2']); | ||
| await expect(page.getByTestId('apmEditButtonEditGroupButton')).toBeVisible(); | ||
| await serviceGroupsPage.expectByText(['synth-go-1', 'synth-go-2']); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see that we had before: ['go services', 'synth-go-1', 'synth-go-2'] should we include GO_SERVICE_GROUP_NAME as well ?
| await test.step('opens service list when clicking on service group card', async () => { | ||
| await page.getByTestId('serviceGroupCard').click(); | ||
| await serviceGroupsPage.expectByText(['go services', 'synth-go-1', 'synth-go-2']); | ||
| await expect(page.getByTestId('apmEditButtonEditGroupButton')).toBeVisible(); |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: We can remove the Edit/Button duplication by changing it to apmEditGroupButton, wdyt?
| testData.OPBEANS_END_DATE | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Verify Transactions tab is selected (same as original Cypress check) |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Q do we need the comments here? I mean we are migrating the tests, IMO it's obvious that it's the same as original Cypress check 🤔
jennypavlova
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This will backport the following commits from
mainto9.2:Questions ?
Please refer to the Backport tool documentation