Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver#233062
Merged
pheyos merged 1 commit intoelastic:mainfrom Aug 27, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
cc @pheyos |
jbudz
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2025
Contributor
|
Starting backport for target branches: 8.19 https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/17267289390 |
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2025
## Summary This makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes the kibana-operations team form the owners list. As part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared ownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full ownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package definition. (cherry picked from commit f67841b)
Contributor
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
kibanamachine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2025
# Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.19`: - [Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver (#233062)](#233062) <!--- Backport version: 9.6.6 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Robert Oskamp","email":"robert.oskamp@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-08-27T12:53:55Z","message":"Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver (#233062)\n\n## Summary\n\nThis makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes\nthe kibana-operations team form the owners list.\n\nAs part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared\nownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full\nownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package\ndefinition.","sha":"f67841b1dc1a7426aff4a1f7a0e5d6cded27dc49","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.2.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","backport:version","v9.2.0","v8.19.3"],"title":"Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver","number":233062,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/233062","mergeCommit":{"message":"Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver (#233062)\n\n## Summary\n\nThis makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes\nthe kibana-operations team form the owners list.\n\nAs part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared\nownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full\nownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package\ndefinition.","sha":"f67841b1dc1a7426aff4a1f7a0e5d6cded27dc49"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.19"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.2.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.2.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/233062","number":233062,"mergeCommit":{"message":"Make appex-qa the single owner of esArchiver (#233062)\n\n## Summary\n\nThis makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes\nthe kibana-operations team form the owners list.\n\nAs part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared\nownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full\nownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package\ndefinition.","sha":"f67841b1dc1a7426aff4a1f7a0e5d6cded27dc49"}},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.3","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Robert Oskamp <robert.oskamp@elastic.co>
kowalczyk-krzysztof
pushed a commit
to kowalczyk-krzysztof/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2025
## Summary This makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes the kibana-operations team form the owners list. As part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared ownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full ownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package definition.
qn895
pushed a commit
to qn895/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2025
## Summary This makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes the kibana-operations team form the owners list. As part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared ownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full ownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package definition.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This makes the appex-qa team the single owner of esArchiver and removes the kibana-operations team form the owners list.
As part of the hand-over, we decided ~2 years ago to go with shared ownership for some time. Since then, the QA team has taken full ownership of esArchiver and it's time to reflect that in the package definition.