Skip to content

[APM] Update Node.js onboarding instructions#22562

Merged
watson merged 2 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
watson:apm-node
Sep 5, 2018
Merged

[APM] Update Node.js onboarding instructions#22562
watson merged 2 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
watson:apm-node

Conversation

@watson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@watson watson commented Aug 30, 2018

The upcoming version of the Node.js agent (v1.12.0) will have automatically pick the a serviceName from the local package.json file and have support for the Restify framework. It's going to be released now and will be compatible with all versions of the Elastic stack from v6.2 and onwards (not sure if this PR therefore should be backported as well?).

To avoid having to keep the list of frameworks in sync, I opted for not naming any. It also gets rid of that weird ending of the sentence with support "custom Node.js" which I never really liked. But feedback is appreciated on the copy. Please also verify that the line have not become too long now?

@watson watson self-assigned this Aug 30, 2018
@watson watson requested review from Qard, makwarth and sorenlouv August 30, 2018 21:47
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@watson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

watson commented Sep 5, 2018

Is it possible to get this into the next release?

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@watson watson merged commit f7fbed3 into elastic:master Sep 5, 2018
@watson watson deleted the apm-node branch September 5, 2018 19:31
@sorenlouv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@watson Feature freeze was yesterday but I think the release was delayed (and this change is isolated from everything else).

Will you backport to 6.x and 6.4 or should I?

@watson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

watson commented Sep 5, 2018

@sqren I already made #22738 for 6.x. I had a chat with @epixa who said that only important bug fixes should go into 6.4 and that this probably didn't count, so while I would prefer to get it in there for the sake of the users, I'm ok with waiting till 6.5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants