UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule "GROUPED OVER" a runtime_mapping field#223975
Merged
doakalexi merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom Jun 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
doakalexi
changed the title
doakalexi
added
release_note:skip
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/response-ops (Team:ResponseOps) |
Contributor
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Async chunks
History
|
ymao1
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2025
Contributor
ymao1
left a comment
ymao1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Verified bug is fixed with this PR 🎉
| setRuleProperty('params', currentRuleParams); | ||
| setXJson(esQuery ?? DEFAULT_VALUES.QUERY); | ||
| const query = esQuery ?? DEFAULT_VALUES.QUERY; | ||
| setXJson(query); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just curious, was it part of the fix to separate this into 2 lines?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no it's not necessary for the fix sorry! I just didnt want to repeat esQuery ?? DEFAULT_VALUES.QUERY in getRuntimeFields so I saved it in a variable. I can put it back tho!
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh I didn't see it was reused later. All good.
Contributor
|
Starting backport for target branches: 8.18, 8.19, 9.0 https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/15715092479 |
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
Contributor
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
1 task
kibanamachine
added
the
backport missing
Contributor
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
doakalexi
added a commit
to doakalexi/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
Contributor
Author
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
doakalexi
added a commit
to doakalexi/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
doakalexi
added a commit
to doakalexi/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…untime_mapping field (elastic#223975) Resolves elastic#221447 ## Summary This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field. ### Checklist Check the PR satisfies following conditions. - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios ### To verify 1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an example that I like to use ``` "runtime_mappings": { "day_of_week": { "type": "keyword", "script": { "source": "emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))" } } }, ``` 2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule 3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected (cherry picked from commit 0a5df04)
doakalexi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…R" a runtime_mapping field (#223975) (#224718) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `9.0`: - [UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule "GROUPED OVER" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)](#223975) <!--- Backport version: 10.0.1 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alexi Doak","email":"109488926+doakalexi@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-06-17T18:19:28Z","message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.1.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","Team:ResponseOps","backport missing","v9.0.0","backport:version","v8.18.0","v9.1.0","v8.19.0"],"title":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field","number":223975,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"9.0","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224320","number":224320,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"8.18","label":"v8.18.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224318","number":224318,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"main","label":"v9.1.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.1.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","number":223975,"mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224319","number":224319,"state":"OPEN"}]}] BACKPORT-->
doakalexi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…ER" a runtime_mapping field (#223975) (#224719) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.19`: - [UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule "GROUPED OVER" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)](#223975) <!--- Backport version: 10.0.1 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alexi Doak","email":"109488926+doakalexi@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-06-17T18:19:28Z","message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.1.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","Team:ResponseOps","backport missing","v9.0.0","backport:version","v8.18.0","v9.1.0","v8.19.0"],"title":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field","number":223975,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"9.0","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224320","number":224320,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"8.18","label":"v8.18.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224318","number":224318,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"main","label":"v9.1.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.1.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","number":223975,"mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224319","number":224319,"state":"OPEN"}]}] BACKPORT-->
doakalexi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
…ER" a runtime_mapping field (#223975) (#224720) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.18`: - [UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule "GROUPED OVER" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)](#223975) <!--- Backport version: 10.0.1 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sorenlouv/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Alexi Doak","email":"109488926+doakalexi@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2025-06-17T18:19:28Z","message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.1.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:skip","Team:ResponseOps","backport missing","v9.0.0","backport:version","v8.18.0","v9.1.0","v8.19.0"],"title":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field","number":223975,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"9.0","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224320","number":224320,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"8.18","label":"v8.18.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224318","number":224318,"state":"OPEN"},{"branch":"main","label":"v9.1.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.1.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/223975","number":223975,"mergeCommit":{"message":"UI bug when editing Elasticsearch query alert rule \"GROUPED OVER\" a runtime_mapping field (#223975)\n\nResolves https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/221447\n\n## Summary\n\nThis PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping\nover a runtime field.\n\n\n### Checklist\n\nCheck the PR satisfies following conditions. \n\n- [ ] [Unit or functional\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\n\n\n### To verify\n\n1. Create a DSL ES Query rule and include a runtime field. Here is an\nexample that I like to use\n```\n \"runtime_mappings\": {\n \"day_of_week\": {\n \"type\": \"keyword\",\n \"script\": {\n \"source\": \"emit(doc['@timestamp'].value.dayOfWeekEnum.getDisplayName(TextStyle.FULL, Locale.ENGLISH))\"\n }\n }\n },\n\n```\n2. Select that field to groupover and save your rule\n3. Edit your rule and click on `GROUPED OVER`, verify that there is no\nerror and the runtime field is selected","sha":"0a5df0462d75b23fc2088957eeca28d46c1ed8d8"}},{"branch":"8.19","label":"v8.19.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/224319","number":224319,"state":"OPEN"}]}] BACKPORT-->
kibanamachine
added
v8.18.3
and removed
backport missing
Contributor
|
This PR didn't make it on time for the latest v8.18.3 and v9.0.3 BC. Updating the labels |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #221447
Summary
This PR fixes a UI bug when editing an ES query rule that's grouping over a runtime field.
Checklist
Check the PR satisfies following conditions.
To verify
GROUPED OVER, verify that there is no error and the runtime field is selected