-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.5k
[Fleet] Use LockManagerService for fleet setup lock #219113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b241ab6
[Fleet] Use LockManagerService for fleet setup lock
nchaulet 76cb039
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/yarn_deduplicate'
kibanamachine 2889df4
fix typo
nchaulet 7ac41f6
Merge branch 'improve-fleet-setup-lock' of github.com:nchaulet/kibana…
nchaulet 9ec5275
fix tests
nchaulet 10130d7
Merge branch 'main' into improve-fleet-setup-lock
elasticmachine ec5f340
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:elastic/kibana into improve-fleet-s…
nchaulet cb29274
Use LockManager for lock
nchaulet File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there is a bug in the retry logic here. From the
pRetrydocumentation:Right now all errors but
LockAcquisitionErrorare thrown, meaning they are aborted without retries. OnlyLockAcquisitionError's are retried.Is that the intention?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that the intention, we already have some retry logic in the Fleet setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All right. Why would you want to retry
setupFn, if it's already running? Then it would run multiple times - although sequentially, not in parallel.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want to be sure the setup ran and finish at least once If it's running on a different instance Kibana, but that instance is killed for any reason, this way we will retry, if the setup was already successful that operation should be relatively quick.