[8.x] Fix context.pageName by fixing missing executionContext and add enableExecutionContextTracking flag (#204547)#204798
Merged
maryam-saeidi merged 1 commit intoelastic:8.xfrom Dec 19, 2024
Conversation
…eExecutionContextTracking flag (elastic#204547) Resolves elastic#195778 ## 🐞 Summary This PR fixes missing executionContext in sharedux router by adding `SharedUXContext` to the `KibanaRootContextProvider` (inside of the `KibanaRenderContextProvider`). (More context provided in this elastic#195778 (comment)) It also introduces `enableExecutionContextTracking` to enable tracking logic to avoid creating a race condition for the existing custom execution context tracking implementations. I enabled this flag for the observability plugin and here is the difference: |Item|Screenshot| |---|---| |Before|| |After|| ### 🧪 How to test - Go to the observability alerts page and check the kibana-browser request as shown above ### ✨ Possible future improvements Allowing this logic to be provided by the consumer so that we can get rid of custom implementations (Example: [APM custom execution context](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/e9671937bacfaa911d32de0e8885e7f26425888a/x-pack/plugins/observability_solution/apm/public/components/routing/app_root/update_execution_context_on_route_change.ts#L21,L25)) --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Dosov <anton.dosov@elastic.co> Co-authored-by: Davis McPhee <davis.mcphee@elastic.co> Co-authored-by: Marco Antonio Ghiani <marcoantonio.ghiani@elastic.co> Co-authored-by: Elena Stoeva <elenastoeva99@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 53748fd) # Conflicts: # packages/react/kibana_context/root/BUILD.bazel
botelastic
bot
added
the
Team:actionable-obs
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/obs-ux-management-team (Team:obs-ux-management) |
Contributor
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsTest Failures
Metrics [docs]Module Count
Public APIs missing comments
Async chunks
Public APIs missing exports
Page load bundle
|
Member
Author
|
Tested and worked as expected:
|
Dosant
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This will backport the following commits from
mainto8.x:Questions ?
Please refer to the Backport tool documentation