-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.6k
RBAC Legacy Fallback #19818
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
RBAC Legacy Fallback #19818
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7dc7349
Basic implementation, rather sloppy
kobelb 7ce7de3
Cleaning stuff up a bit
kobelb c2a67bb
Beginning to write tests, going to refactor how we build the privileges
kobelb 329bfa4
Making the buildPrivilegesMap no longer return application name as the
kobelb 30e91ea
Using real privileges since we need to use them for the legacy fallback
kobelb 7f93cfb
Adding more tests
kobelb bfae62b
Fixing spelling
kobelb 82f4c6b
Fixing test description
kobelb f47804b
Fixing comment description
kobelb 98223f2
Adding similar line breaks in the has privilege calls
kobelb 516c037
No more settings
kobelb 3c6c061
No more rbac enabled setting, we just do RBAC
kobelb 10add22
Using describe to cleanup the test cases
kobelb b9ab949
Logging deprecations when using the legacy fallback
kobelb 0a541ab
Cleaning up a bit...
kobelb 5d73c1f
Using the privilegeMap for the legacy fallback tests
kobelb b253406
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/security-app-privs' into legac…
kobelb d96d007
Now with even less duplication
kobelb 45efe42
Removing stray `rbacEnabled` from angularjs
kobelb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies for the huge diff, this was just removing this ^^ if check and the indentation change makes it look larger than it is.