Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x] [Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms (#193375) #195518

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.x:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

…rithms (elastic#193375)

## Summary

Completes elastic#190482

Switches rule `type` field to use the implemented diff algorithms
assigned to them in elastic#193369

Adds integration tests in accordance to
elastic#193372 for the `upgrade/_review`
API endpoint for the rule `type` field diff algorithm.

Also fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs
with some test files

### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] [Flaky Test
Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was
used on any tests changed

### For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)

(cherry picked from commit e119d83)
@dplumlee
Copy link
Contributor

dplumlee commented Oct 9, 2024

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@kibanamachine kibanamachine merged commit 25132be into elastic:8.x Oct 9, 2024
30 checks passed
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

cc @dplumlee

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants