[8.7] [Security Solution] Allow rewriting rule create props in Cypress tests (#153474)#154332
Merged
maximpn merged 1 commit intoelastic:8.7from Apr 4, 2023
Merged
Conversation
elastic#153474) **Relates to:** elastic#150553 ## Summary This PR is based on the review comments in elastic#150553. It allows to rewrite rule create properties. ## Details Rule create properties are returned by helper functions like `getNewRule()`, `getNewThresholdRule()` and so on. So instead of `createRule({ ...getNewRule(), index: undefined, data_view_id: DATA_VIEW_ID, rule_id: '1' })` it allows to use a concise and a much more readable structure `createRule(getNewRule({ index: undefined, data_view_id: DATA_VIEW_ID, rule_id: '1' ))`. ## Possible improvements The PR doesn't implement deep / nested fields merge. High level fields completely rewrite default values. Deep merge would allow to extend defaults with the provided rewrites. For example, overriding nested properties become tiresome quickly, as shown in the following code snippet: ```ts const rule = { ...getNewTermsRule(), rule_id: 'new_rule_id', runsEvery: { interval: '1', ...getNewTermsRule().runsEvery, }, }; ``` If we implement deep merge, the readability could be greatly improved: ```ts const rule = getNewTermsRule({ rule_id: 'new_rule_id', runsEvery: { interval: '1', }, }); ``` While it looks as a good idea we should take into consideration the fact that complete rewriting of default values can be a desired behavior. Engineers could tend to switch to `createRule({ ...getNewRule(), index: undefined, data_view_id: DATA_VIEW_ID, rule_id: '1' })` to overcome deep merge. So it should be analysed carefully before implementing it. (cherry picked from commit ca696ac) # Conflicts: # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/cypress/e2e/detection_alerts/alerts_charts.cy.ts # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/cypress/e2e/detection_alerts/detection_page_filters.cy.ts # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/cypress/e2e/exceptions/add_edit_flyout/flyout_validation.cy.ts
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This will backport the following commits from
mainto8.7:Questions ?
Please refer to the Backport tool documentation