-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.6k
[Fleet] Add support for select type in integrations #152550
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jillguyonnet
merged 14 commits into
elastic:main
from
jillguyonnet:jillguyonnet/fleet-add-select-integrations
Mar 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
798f4d5
[Fleet] Add support for select type in integrations
jillguyonnet 1aac360
Fix linting issues
jillguyonnet 3c9e055
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/precommit_hook.js -…
kibanamachine 1f53fa2
Add options property to registry vars
jillguyonnet b2d5fce
Use options category
jillguyonnet d61c937
Fix linting error
jillguyonnet a586480
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/precommit_hook.js -…
kibanamachine 6ba4907
Make options optional
jillguyonnet 717baae
Add validation test cases
jillguyonnet 647aad0
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/precommit_hook.js -…
kibanamachine 3f03a3f
Add validation unit test
jillguyonnet 116185e
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/precommit_hook.js -…
kibanamachine df3ec99
Amend validation
jillguyonnet 3f950b7
[CI] Auto-commit changed files from 'node scripts/precommit_hook.js -…
kibanamachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was suspicious about memoizing an array since it would be compared by reference, but I'm not sure at all if that could be an issue in this case. I didn't see any strangeness with local testing. Does anyone know?