Added Component Integration Test for Flush Action in Index Management#114401
Conversation
|
Pinging @elastic/kibana-stack-management (Team:Stack Management) |
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
sabarasaba
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for working on this @cuff-links! Changes LGTM, just had a suggestions for simplifying the button selector and maybe abstracting the clicking logic into a new action:
x-pack/plugins/index_management/__jest__/client_integration/home/indices_tab.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…lush_Indices_Index_Management
…om:cuff-links/kibana into Add_CIT_For_Flush_Indices_Index_Management
💚 Build SucceededMetrics [docs]
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
|
The following labels were identified as gaps in your version labels and will be added automatically:
If any of these should not be on your pull request, please manually remove them. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
26 similar comments
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
|
Looks like this PR has backport PRs but they still haven't been merged. Please merge them ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync. |
…#114401) (#115248) * Aded some data test subjects for the test. * Added flush indices test. * Fixed linting issue. * Merged test subject PR in and updated tests. Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: John Dorlus <silne.dorlus@elastic.co>
Summary
This PR adds a component integration test that checks that we are able to click the flush index button and check the last request to ensure that it was made to the flush index API.