[8.0] Support multiple endpoints

[michalpristas]

What is the problem this PR solves?

What this PR solves is a problem when agent got unenrolled on heavier load when agent managing fleet server cannot checkin to it's own server so it will fallback to unenroll.
Closes #741

How does this PR solve the problem?

Problem is solved by adding internal endpoint which is used for communication on local network (with agent handling fleet server)
It lets FS to spin up 2 set of handlers, one on public 8220 and one on port defined in config.

How to test this PR locally

This needs to be tested with work on elastic-agent Link: elastic/beats#28993

• Start stack
• Install agent with FS in a policy
• Check ports

sh-3.2# lsof -i -P | grep LISTEN | grep fleet
fleet-ser  7056            root   19u  IPv4 0xba7881a9227099a5      0t0    TCP localhost:{random_port} (LISTEN)
fleet-ser  7056            root   21u  IPv6 0xba7881a91284721d      0t0    TCP *:8220 (LISTEN)

• run wireshark, set filter to random port, there should be some comm
• set filter to 8220 port, there should be no comm
• enroll new agent, from another VM
• there should be some comm on both ports

Checklist

• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

[mergify]

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it @michalpristas? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b backport_multiple_endpoints-8.0 upstream/backport_multiple_endpoints-8.0
git merge upstream/master
git push upstream backport_multiple_endpoints-8.0

[mergify]

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @michalpristas? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

• backport-v/d./d./d is the label to automatically backport to the 7./d branch. /d is the digit

NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.