-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Searchable snapshots mounted in the 'hot' phase should be pinned to hot nodes #72696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Searchable snapshots mounted in the 'hot' phase should be pinned to hot nodes #72696
Conversation
5c968eb to
d632d26
Compare
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (Team:Core/Features) |
|
|
dakrone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I left two really minor requests for comments so that we don't lose our reasoning down the line next time we look at this code.
x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/MigrateAction.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/MountSnapshotStep.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
andreidan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for working on this @joegallo
I've left a couple of comments
x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/MigrateAction.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...de/src/javaRestTest/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ilm/actions/SearchableSnapshotActionIT.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dakrone
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM after addressing Andrei's comment
f241667 to
46e4ba4
Compare
andreidan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for working on this @joegallo
Closes #72340
Some bits of this have the effect of reverting or altering some parts of #68861 (which itself closed #68635) -- so I added @andreidan as a reviewer to make sure he agrees with where we landed here.