Skip to content

Conversation

@andreidan
Copy link
Contributor

After we rollover the index we wait for the configured number of shards for the
rolled index to become active (based on the index.write.wait_for_active_shards
setting which might be present in a template, or otherwise in the default case,
for the primaries to become active).
This wait might be long due to disk watermarks being tripped, replicas not
being able to spring to life due to cluster nodes reconfiguration and others
and, the RolloverStep might not complete successfully due to this inherent
transient situation, albeit the rolled index having been created.

(cherry picked from commit 457a92f)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan [email protected]

Backport of #50718

…c#50718)

After we rollover the index we wait for the configured number of shards for the
rolled index to become active (based on the index.write.wait_for_active_shards
setting which might be present in a template, or otherwise in the default case,
for the primaries to become active).
This wait might be long due to disk watermarks being tripped, replicas not
being able to spring to life due to cluster nodes reconfiguration and others
and, the RolloverStep might not complete successfully due to this inherent
transient situation, albeit the rolled index having been created.

(cherry picked from commit 457a92f)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <[email protected]>
@andreidan andreidan added backport v7.7.0 :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management labels Jan 22, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

@andreidan andreidan merged commit 1232667 into elastic:7.x Jan 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v7.7.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants