Skip to content

Conversation

@astefan
Copy link
Contributor

@astefan astefan commented Jan 20, 2020

The hierarchy of fields/sub-fields under a field that is of an
unsupported data type will be marked as unsupported as well. Until this
change, the behavior was to set the unsupported data type field's
hierarchy as empty.

Example, considering the following hierarchy of fields/sub-fields
a -> b -> c -> d, if b would be of type "foo", then b, c and d will
be marked as unsupported.

Backport for #50823.

(cherry picked from commit 7adb286)

…c#50823)

The hierarchy of fields/sub-fields under a field that is of an
unsupported data type will be marked as unsupported as well. Until this
change, the behavior was to set the unsupported data type field's
hierarchy as empty.

Example, considering the following hierarchy of fields/sub-fields
a -> b -> c -> d, if b would be of type "foo", then b, c and d will
be marked as unsupported.

(cherry picked from commit 7adb286)
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/SQL)

@astefan
Copy link
Contributor Author

astefan commented Jan 20, 2020

@elasticmachine update branch

@astefan astefan added the >bug label Jan 20, 2020
@astefan astefan merged commit df36169 into elastic:7.x Jan 20, 2020
astefan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2020
#51220)

The hierarchy of fields/sub-fields under a field that is of an
unsupported data type will be marked as unsupported as well. Until this
change, the behavior was to set the unsupported data type field's
hierarchy as empty.

Example, considering the following hierarchy of fields/sub-fields
a -> b -> c -> d, if b would be of type "foo", then b, c and d will
be marked as unsupported.

(cherry picked from commit 7adb286)
(cherry picked from commit df36169)
astefan added a commit to astefan/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
…c#50823) (elastic#51220)

The hierarchy of fields/sub-fields under a field that is of an
unsupported data type will be marked as unsupported as well. Until this
change, the behavior was to set the unsupported data type field's
hierarchy as empty.

Example, considering the following hierarchy of fields/sub-fields
a -> b -> c -> d, if b would be of type "foo", then b, c and d will
be marked as unsupported.

(cherry picked from commit 7adb286)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants