Remove outdated requirement of CCR#50859
Conversation
dnhatn
added
>docs
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/CCR) |
|
Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs) |
| For more information about index settings, see {ref}/index-modules.html[Index modules]. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| [[ccr-overview-beats]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like the Beats and APM docs link to this section. Can we add a redirect to redirects.asciidoc so these links don't break?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That note (elastic/beats#9427) can be removed from the docs, as it no longer applies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I opened elastic/beats#15506 to remove the note in the Beats/APM docs. The docs CI tests will continue to fail for this PR until that's merged or we add a redirect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dnhatn elastic/beats#15506 is now merged. If you update this branch, the docs CI test should pick up the changes in Beats and pass.
|
run elasticsearch-ci/docs |
|
@dnhatn Looks like my PR missed a link. Opened elastic/apm-server#3147 to remove. |
|
@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/docs |
|
@jasontedor @jrodewig Thanks for reviewing. |
With retention leases, users do not need to set index.soft_deletes.retention.operations. This change removes it from the requirements of CCR
With retention leases, users do not need to set index.soft_deletes.retention.operations. This change removes it from the requirements of CCR
With retention leases, users do not need to set index.soft_deletes.retention.operations. This change removes it from the requirements of CCR
With retention leases, users do not need to set index.soft_deletes.retention.operations. This change removes it from the requirements of CCR
5 participants
With retention leases, users do not need to set
index.soft_deletes.retention.operations. This change removes it from the requirements of CCR.