-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
Fix circuit breaker leak in BreakingTDigestHolder #143873
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
036ef01
Fix circuit breaker leak in BreakingTDigestHolder
JonasKunz 64f4b43
Merge branch 'main' into tdigestbuilder-cranky-fix
JonasKunz 9ad901e
Merge branch 'main' into tdigestbuilder-cranky-fix
JonasKunz c03f918
Merge branch 'main' into tdigestbuilder-cranky-fix
JonasKunz 4554f44
Merge branch 'main' into tdigestbuilder-cranky-fix
JonasKunz a0c55fd
Merge branch 'main' into tdigestbuilder-cranky-fix
JonasKunz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be called after adding the estimated bytes to the breaker, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BreakingBytesRefBuilderperforms the memory accounting for itself in the constructor.The
addEstimateBytesAndMaybeBreakis just for the shallow object size ofBreakingBytesStreamOutput.Technically,
BreakingBytesStreamOutputhas already been allocated here because we are in the constructor and we adjust the breaker afterwards. However, the object is so small that this overshoot doesn't really matter,BreakingBytesRefBuilderdoes the same.You shouldn't do this if e.g. you are allocating large arrays: In that case you should make sure to adjust the breaker before you allocate. For objects this usually means adding a factory method which does the accounting and only calling the constructor at the end of it. However, for such small objects this is not worth the additional lines of code.