ESQL - Revert Use high speed strategy for LuceneTopNSourceOperator#142453
Merged
carlosdelest merged 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom Feb 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…lastic#142128)" This reverts commit f1ed358.
carlosdelest
added
>non-issue
Team:Search Relevance
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-search-relevance (Team:Search Relevance) |
mromaios
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2026
Contributor
mromaios
left a comment
mromaios
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving given this is a revert. I haven’t fully digested the code 😅
sidosera
pushed a commit
to sidosera/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
…lastic#142128)" (elastic#142453) This reverts commit f1ed358.
This was referenced Feb 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts #142128, as it has had a negative p50 impact on the wikipedia track. It was not observed during measurement as p90 stays the same.
Given it did not have a positive impact on any metric, let's revert this change and keep working on #141770