-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
Add shard heap usage to ClusterInfo #139557
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
elasticsearchmachine
merged 16 commits into
elastic:main
from
DiannaHohensee:2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
Feb 24, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9da594e
Add shard heap usage to ClusterInfo
DiannaHohensee 6f3270d
refactor names to indicate bytes
DiannaHohensee ea0be4b
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 1ff495e
change to non-negative random longs in testing; add a few checks in I…
DiannaHohensee b82f12d
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee dcecd8d
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 3f122a3
fix transport version
DiannaHohensee 0fa8e28
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee e56e741
fix transport version
DiannaHohensee f7aa908
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 0262ef4
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 8ff52e2
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee d4f85ac
fix after merge
DiannaHohensee 70c7fca
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 111a58a
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee 0c0746f
Merge branch 'main' into 2025/12/11/ES-12882-simulate-heap
DiannaHohensee File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should only have to put a single document in each index and we'd get a non-zero value here wouldn't we? (because of the mapping size in bytes at least)
Then we could assert
greaterThan(0L)which seems stronger?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not certain what you mean. The heap values are randomly generated for this test, anywhere from 0 to Long.MAX_VALUE. So even if some writes were done, that would not guarantee a non-zero value?
Stateful doesn't have real metrics for heap usage, that's only in serverless.