Support from/to directly in the new Histogram Aggregation

[fbuecklers]

First of all nice to see, the ES has implemented the Histogram Aggregation.

Our use case is that we store many timer values in pre-aggregated histogram fields in our indices.
Over this aggregated histogram data we want to visualize the distribution of those timers for a given time range.
The new Histogram Aggregation fits well here to get the results for the visualization except that we want to view only a specific range of the timers. The documentation states that we should prefilter our data by a range aggregation with the from/to filter.
But these do not work in our case if we use pre-aggregated histogram values as a source for the aggregation.

Therefore it should be possible to define a min/from - max/to range in the aggregation directly get only a specific range of the data.

We can't do this in the visualization step since the returned JSON by the histogram aggregation becomes too large to handle that properly in the frontend.

[elasticmachine]

Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (:Analytics/Aggregations)

[imotov]

@fbuecklers in 7.10.0 we are adding a new feature called hard_bounds. I wonder if this will work for your needs.

[fbuecklers]

Wow, that is exactly the missing piece, if it works on preaggregated histogram fields.

I don't know if I should open another ticket, but will the histogram aggregation also be supported in roll-up indices in the future? We want to reaggregate our preaggregated histograms in a rolling fashion to span larger time ranges. The resulting index should contain then a new histogram field as a result of the histogram aggregation.

[polyfractal]

I don't know if I should open another ticket, but will the histogram aggregation also be supported in roll-up indices in the future?

@fbuecklers that's roughly the plan :) We added the new histogram field specifically so that we could support histograms/percentiles/etc in Rollup eventually. It'll probably be landing in the refactored form of Rollups rather than the existing form, but one way or another we'll be adding support to rollups

We're still hammering out details about how exactly it will be implemented/used. E.g. I'm not sure if the particular scenario you mentioned (rolling up rollups) will be supported or not because we haven't quite gotten there, but the general idea is indeed to have this functionality available :)

[imotov]

I opened #62124 to avoid confusion. Closing this one.