Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #968 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.08% 71.16% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 344 360 +16
Lines 10959 10587 -372
Branches 2393 2161 -232
==========================================
- Hits 7790 7534 -256
+ Misses 3155 2964 -191
- Partials 14 89 +75
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
I think this was working at one point, not 100% sure. This was discussed at length here #749 (comment) when implementing the legend actions. I don't think this is the right solution for this as it is because it changes the aesthetic of the legend. That said, I 100% agree this needs to be corrected. |
|
Thanks @nickofthyme this PR doesn't change aesthetics perceptibly, except a 1-2px shift of the entire legends block upwards, but maybe this is what you referred to (CI detects it) - so it's great to go ahead as we discussed on our call |
f1fd618 to
d9722b6
Compare
|
@monfera Checkout this commit d9722b6. I am sorry to force push to your branch but a made a copy just in case. The trick is to add half of the padding to the |
|
@nickofthyme looks great, I agree with the |
|
@miukimiu Could you take a look at these changes? Should be the same UI overall. |
|
@nickofthyme how should the still remaining CI issue be solved? Is it a question of regenerating some image, or something deeper? Should we, and/or @miukimiu look into removing the visual difference you show above? My slant is, seeing this merged soon as it's a small code change yet good usability improvement, and I'm not concerned about snapshot changes of a couple of pixels of legend position |
|
@monfera I'll look into the small px shift. |
5cbcca2 to
47493e2
Compare
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 24.5.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |


Summary
Closes #944
More important for the upcoming hierarchical layout hover strategy PR and the flame/icicle chart than for existing charts
Before, with gaps, see how the activation is temporarily lost between rows, with all colors flashing back:

After, no gaps, no flashing:

It shifts images up by 1px or 2px, which seems OK, as it's important that
padding-topandpadding-bottomequal (text is in the vertical middle of the mouse capture zone)Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.