-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
[beatreceiver] Drop failed doc inputs from ES exporter #8738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ES exporter always uses a create action when indexing log records. If a document fails for any reason and the original input is part of the response - the log message will always contain
We drop this event to ensure sensitive data is not sent to fleet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When the collector is a sub-process, we could also look at directing these logs into our event log using a similar pattern to preserve the existing behavior where logs from events can't clutter the main logs. We could perhaps do this now I just know once we are a sub-process we'll be consuming the logs from the stdout/stderr stream instead of via our own in-process logger.
CC @pkoutsovasilis.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that sounds good and is possible to do.
This is the code change we would need to do when otel collector runs as sub process.
https://github.com/elastic/elastic-agent/compare/main...khushijain21:elastic-agent:collectorEvent?expand=
that would make the current changeset unnecessary - maybe we should wait until the collector runs as a subprocess by default. wdyt?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a quick testing and
ndjsonparser in filebeat monitoring https://github.com/khushijain21/elastic-agent/blob/eventLogs/internal/pkg/agent/application/monitoring/v1_monitor.go#L579 does not parse json recursively.This field is never parsed and indexed. We should be good even without dropping this event explicitly :))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc : @cmacknz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK this is nice, I think we should have an explicit test for this behavior as it is a security concern (in agent, that these errors cannot be indexed). Can you add one as a follow up?
We have similar tests of the event log functionality.