Skip to content

Conversation

@ebeahan
Copy link
Member

@ebeahan ebeahan commented Nov 14, 2025

What does this PR do?

Reverts the change to USE_PACKAGE_VERSION="false" needed for #11106.

Needs #11189 first.

Why is it important?

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the pull request guidelines of this project.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool
  • I have added an integration test or an E2E test

Disruptive User Impact

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Questions to ask yourself

  • How are we going to support this in production?
  • How are we going to measure its adoption?
  • How are we going to debug this?
  • What are the metrics I should take care of?
  • ...

@ebeahan ebeahan requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 13:53
@ebeahan ebeahan requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2025 13:53
@ebeahan ebeahan marked this pull request as draft November 14, 2025 13:54
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @ebeahan? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-./d./d is the label that automatically backports to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit
  • backport-active-all is the label that automatically backports to all active branches.
  • backport-active-8 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 8 major.
  • backport-active-9 is the label that automatically backports to all active minor branches for the 9 major.

@ebeahan ebeahan marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2025 15:24
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

elasticmachine commented Nov 14, 2025

@ebeahan
Copy link
Member Author

ebeahan commented Nov 14, 2025

The remaining failures are related to known problem: #10917.

I'd like to get this reverted ASAP and the failures are not related to packaging. Force merging.

@ebeahan ebeahan merged commit f3e6551 into elastic:main Nov 14, 2025
18 of 21 checks passed
@ebeahan ebeahan deleted the revert-use-package-version-false branch November 14, 2025 19:37
hayotbisonai pushed a commit to hayotbisonai/elastic-agent that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants