[RFC] 0008: Correct expected indicator.type value for X509 Certificates#1468
Closed
adriansr wants to merge 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
Closed
[RFC] 0008: Correct expected indicator.type value for X509 Certificates#1468adriansr wants to merge 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
adriansr wants to merge 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
Conversation
The documentation for the `indicator.type` field lists `x-509-certificate` as an expected value. However, the correct STIX 2.0 Cyber Observable type name for X509 Certificates is `x509-certificate`.
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a minor change to a field's description in RFC 0008 (Threat Intel).
The documentation for the
indicator.typefield listsx-509-certificateas an expected value. However, the correct STIX 2.0 Cyber Observable type name for X509 Certificates isx509-certificate, according to the STIX 2.0 docs.