-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 447
Add event.category registry #1040
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
1f57c64
b9b7efc
5e085bd
68d4054
77a7d04
78f0624
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -277,6 +277,15 @@ | |
| - end | ||
| - info | ||
| - start | ||
| - name: registry | ||
| description: > | ||
| Having to do with settings and assets stored in the Windows registry. | ||
| Use this category to visualize and analyze activity such as registry access and modifications. | ||
| expected_event_types: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. thanks for the add. These values may not be specific enough, because they don't differentiate between key vs value changes. But I think 99% of the time, we're looking at changed values, not keys. So this is okay in my opinion.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @MikePaquette Did you have a specific use in mind for "info"? This proposal is not yet adding it as an expected value. One way Auditbeat uses "info" is to dump a list of all running processes, to establish a baseline. Then it reports process start/end as things happen. I could see a similar use for dumping a set of registry keys (hopefully not the whole hive); then monitor for changes with creation/change/deletion. Was that the idea?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @rw-access On specificity wrt key vs value activity, I'm not sure we should change the allowed values in I would think |
||
| - access | ||
webmat marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| - change | ||
| - creation | ||
| - deletion | ||
| - name: session | ||
| description: > | ||
| The session category is applied to events and metrics regarding logical persistent connections to hosts and services. | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.