[8.17](backport #43026) Don't package arm64 on amd64 workers #43065
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
botelastic
bot
added
the
needs_team
|
This pull request doesn't have a |
Contributor
Author
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @dliappis? 🙏 |
Contributor
|
Blocked until the corresponding backport of #43090 gets merged |
6 tasks
Contributor
|
Successfully tested via a DRA job trigger (note this is an elastic internal link) |
dliappis
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2025
Contributor
dliappis
left a comment
dliappis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Successfully tested via #43065 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed commit message
This commit is the counterpart of
#43019 for the DRA packaging pipeline.
It ensures that arm64 packages get built without qemu emulation on dedicated arm64 workers.
How to test this PR locally
Successful BK link:
https://buildkite.com/elastic/beats-packaging-pipeline/builds/2656#01956655-e341-4ec5-a3a2-859c4fac28a8
and another one using the latest commit: https://buildkite.com/elastic/beats-packaging-pipeline/builds/2664
where both staging + snapshot got triggered using
DRA_DRY_RUN=falseAdditionally, I compared the DRA job output for snapshot artifacts from the above triggered job , against the latest successful DRA build on main and the results were identical.
Related issues
Closes #43042
Screenshots
This is an automatic backport of pull request #43026 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).