Skip to content

Conversation

@rowlandgeoff
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that the beats-packaging-pipeline wasn't triggering automatically on the 8.x branch. Looks like adjusting this regex should fix that.

@rowlandgeoff rowlandgeoff self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@rowlandgeoff rowlandgeoff requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 19:19
@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Sep 26, 2024
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 26, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @rowlandgeoff? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 26, 2024

backport-8.x has been added to help with the transition to the new branch 8.x.
If you don't need it please use backport-skip label and remove the backport-8.x label.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify label Sep 26, 2024
@rowlandgeoff rowlandgeoff merged commit d867c96 into main Sep 26, 2024
@rowlandgeoff rowlandgeoff deleted the 8xPackaging branch September 26, 2024 19:46
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
rowlandgeoff added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
@khushijain21 khushijain21 mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport-8.x Automated backport to the 8.x branch with mergify Team:Ingest-EngProd

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants