Cherry-pick #15504 to 7.x: Add layouts to the String method of the timestamp processor #16846
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/integrations (Team:Integrations) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #15504 to 7.x branch. Original message:
When dealing with autodiscover & hints, especially, that generate new configurations depending on the discovered workloads, having the
layoutsas part of the debug message is quite useful for checking what the timestamp processor is trying to match against the target field.Co-authored-by: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez [email protected]