Cherry-pick #13651 to 7.4: Remove in_cluster from Kuberentes configuration examples#13688
Merged
ChrsMark merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.4from Sep 16, 2019
Merged
Conversation
in_cluster from Kuberentes configuration examples
Member
|
jenkins, test this again |
jsoriano
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2019
Member
jsoriano
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, I think that failures in CI are not related but I'd like to see one of Jenkins or Travis jobs green before merging.
Member
Author
|
Jenkins failure seems unrelated. Merging since Travis build was successful. |
leweafan
pushed a commit
to leweafan/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
…3651) (elastic#13688) (cherry picked from commit 486c747)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #13651 to 7.4 branch. Original message:
This configuration was removed by #13051.
This PR is clean up for any remaining references of this configuration filed.
Kudos to @jsoriano for bringing this up in #13473
cc: @odacremolbap, @exekias